Q the History of the Tower or Steeple, the Stupas and the Awarakacha

Source - The Rosicrucians Their Rites and Mysteries by Hargrave Jennings - Part 2

THE ROSICRUCIANS

PART II

CHAPTER THE FIRST

HISTORY OF THE TOWER OR STEEPLE

WE have asserted, in an earlier part of our book, that the pyramidal or triangular form which fire assumes in its ascent to heaven was, in the monolithic typology, used to signify the Great Generative Power. The coarse sensuality which seems inseparable from modern ideas about the worship of the pillar or upright had no place really in the solemn ancient mind, in which ideas of religion largely and constantly mingled. We must not judge the ancients by too rigid an adherence to our own prepossessions--foolish and inveterately hardened as they continually are.

The adoration paid to this image of the phallus, which has persisted as an object of worship through all the ages, in all countries, was only the acknowledgment, in the ancient mind, of wonder at the seemingly accidental and unlikely, but certainly most complete and effectual, means by which the continuation of the human race is secured. The cabalistic arguers contended that 'Man' was a phenomenon; that he did not, otherwise than in his presentment, seem intended; that there appeared nothing even in the stupendous chain of organisms that seemed specially to hint his approach, or to explain his appearance (strange as this seems), according to likelihood and sequence; that between the highest of the animals and the being 'Man' there was a great gulf, and seemingly an impassable gulf; that some 'after-reason', to speak according to the means of the comprehension of man, induced his introduction into the Great Design; that, in short, 'Man' originally was not intended. There is a deep mystery underlying all these ideas, which we find differently accounted for in the various theologies.

We are here only speaking some of the abstruse speculations of the old philosophers, whose, idea of creation, and of the nature of man and his destiny, differed most materially--if not wholly--from the acceptable ideas which they chose to inculcate, and which they wished to impress upon ordinary minds. Thus their deeper speculations were never committed to writing, because they did not admit of, interpretation in this way; and if so handed down or promulgated, they would have been sure to have been rejected and disbelieved, on account of the impossibility of their being believed. In indicating some of the strange notions propounded by the Sophists, and, if possible, still more remarkably by the early Christian Fathers, we desire to disclaim any participation with them. Our personal belief of these theories must not be necessarily supposed from our seeming to advocate them. There is no doubt that they were very acute and profound persons who undertook the examination and reconcilement of the philosophical systems at the introduction of Christianity.

Fig 46: Pyramid; Fig. 47: Tower or 'Tor'; Fig 48: Tower; Fig. 49: Tower of Babel; Fig. 50: Pyramid; Fig 51: Scarabæus.

The succeeding array of phallic figures will be found interesting, as tracing out to its progenitor or prototype that symbol which we call the 'upright'. This architectural descent we shall call the 'Genealogy of the Tower or Steeple'.

The Architectural Genealogy of the 'Tower' or 'Steeple' (so to speak) is full of suggestion, and is closely connected with the story of the phallus.

The insignia on the heads of the cobras in the friezes of the Egyptian Court in the Crystal Palace are coloured on the Right, White, on the Left, Red. These imply masculine and feminine ideas.

Fig. 52: Egyptian Colossus; Fig. 53: Pyramid; Fig. 54: Egyptian Seated Figure (British Museum)

Fig. 42 is the Winged Human-headed Lion. It comes from the Nineveh Gallery. It may be recognized as the Winged Bull, and also as the Winged 'Lion of St Mark'.

The 'Lion', 'Bull', 'Eagle', 'Man', are the symbols of the Evangelists; the 'Man', or 'Angel' standing for St. Matthew, the 'Lion' for St. Mark, the 'Bull' for St. Luke, and the 'Eagle' for St. John. In these strange aspects the Evangelists figured in many ancient churches, and on most fonts. These representative forms are also said to have been the 'Four Cherubim' of the Ark of the Hebrews. Hermetically they signify the 'four elements', or the four corners or angle-points of the 'Lesser' or 'Manifested World', or the 'Microcosm' of the Cabalists.

Fig. 55: Colossal Head (British Museum)

Fig. 45 represents an Obelisk at Nineveh, now in the British Museum. Jacob's Pillar, the Sacred Stone in Westminster Abbey, 'Bethel', etc., 'Gilgal', have a mythic alliance with the obelisk.

Regarding the pyramids the following may be advanced: Murphy, the delineator of the Alhambra, considered the Pointed Arch to be a system founded on the principle of the Pyramid. The pointed or vertical Saracenic or Gothic arch presents the form of the upper portion of the human φαλλος. The Saracenic arch denotes the union of the Linga and Yoni.

In fig. 56 we have the sun rising from between the horns of Eblis (here taken for the pyramids). This is a poetical superstition of the Arabians, who therefore turn to the North to pray it contradiction to the practice of the Persians, who adore the rising sun. The Arabians avert in prayer from this malific sign of the 'horns', because the sun is seen rising from between them; and when disclosing from between these mythic pillars, the sun becomes a portent.

Fig. 58: Figures on the Egyptian Sarcophagus in the British Museum.

Fig. 57 is an Egyptian seal, copied by Layard (Nineveh and Babylon, p. 156). Subject: the Egyptian god Harpocrates, seated on the mythic lotus, in adoration of the Yoni, or ‏הוה‎, or havah.

The Druidical Circles, and single stones standing in solitary places, are all connected with the mystic speculations of the Rosicrucians.

The eminences, St. Michael's Mount and Mont St.-Michel, were dedicated by the Phœnicians to the Sun-God (Hercules), as the 'Hydra' or 'Dragon-slayer'.

Figs. 60, 61: Heads of Ships: a. Fiddle-head; b, c, d. Gondola; e. Ceres’ Reaping-hook, also Saturn; f. Blade and Fasces; g. Beak of Galley; h. Glaive; i. Prow of Grecian Galley. Fig. 62: Stonehenge

These mounts in the Channel are secondary 'Hercules’ Pillars', similar to Calpe and Abyla.

The Architectural Genealogy of the 'Tower' or 'Steeple' displays other phases of the alterations of the 'upright'. All towers are descendants of the biblical votive stones, and in multiplying have changed in aspect according to the ideas of the people of the country in which they were raised. This Architectural Genealogy of the 'Tower' or 'Steeple' gives many varieties.

The groups on p. 244 supply new changes in the Tower or Upright, and furnish evidence how it passed into the Christian times, and became the steeple. When thus changed and reproduced, according, to the architectural ideas of the builders of the different countries. where the same memorial pillar was raised, it assumed in time the peculiarities of the Gothic or pointed style. The steeples of the churches, the figures of which we give on p. 244, indicate the gradual growth and expansion of the romantic or pointed architecture, which is generally called Gothic; and they prove how the upright, or original phallic form, was adopted and gradually mingled in Christian architecture--in reality at last becoming its dominant feature.

Fig. 63: Druidical Stone in Persia; Fig. 64: Druidical Circle at Darab, in Arabia Fig. 65: 'Kit's Cotty-house', Kent; Figs. 66. 67 Ancient British Coin, mentioned by Camden; Figs. 68 and 69: St. Michael or the Sun (Hercules) Fig. 68: England: St. Michael's Mount, Mount's Bay, Cornwall. 'Dragon', Horns, or Fires. (Moloch or Baal) British Channel, 'Dragon-mouth' (Galilee from the West) Fig. 69: France, Normandy: Mont St.-Michel. ('Montjoie!' 'Montjoy!'--old Battle-cry of the Gauls.) 'Dragon'. Horns, or Fires. (Moloch or Baal).

Fig. 71: Round Tower Devenish, Ireland; Fig. 70 Round Tower, Ireland; Fig. 72: Obeliscus; Fig. 73: Obelisk; Fig. 75: Two Round Towers.

Fig. 74: Propylon, Thebes; Fig. 77: The 'Cootub Minar', near Delhi, supposed to have been built circa 1220; Fig. 78: Antrim Round Tower; Fig. 76: Round Tower at Bhaugulpore, India.

Fig. 96 represents one of the Western Towers of St. Paul's Cathedral, London, which is one of the double lithoi (or obelisks), placed always in front of every temple, Christian as well as heathen. It is surmounted by the 'fir-cone' (thyrsus) of Bacchus, and the sculptured urns below it are represented as flaming with the mystic fire.

The Architectural Genealogy of the 'Tower' or 'Steeple' in fig. 97, p. 246, exemplifies a parallel of growth between all the uprights, and exhibits their changes of form, and proves their reproduction through the centuries, both in the East, and more particularly in the western countries of Europe. In the lower portion of this fig. 97 we have a further outline-configuration of various towers and steeples, displaying the new character given, and the gradual variations of the 'Tower', in the first instance, and afterwards of the 'Steeple'; both being reproductions of the first idea of the lithos, upright, or phallus: the 'Idol' imitative of the 'Flame of Fire'.

Fig. 79: Round Tower, Peru; Fig. 80: Persian Round Tower (From Hanway); Fig. 81: Round Tower, Central America; Fig. 82: Mudros of Phœnicia (Dr Hyde); Fig. 83: Mahody of Elephanta (Capt. Pyke); Fig. 84: Muidhr of Inismurry; Fig. 85: Pillar-stone, Hill of Tara.

Fig. 86: Brixworth Church, Northamptonsh., supposed circa 670. Fig. 87: Tower in Dover Castle, circa 400 Fig. 88: Turret at the east end of St. Peter's Church, Oxford, circa 1180 Fig. 89: Little Saxam Church, Suffolk, circa 1120 Fig. 90: Rochester Cathedral (Turret), 1180 Fig. 91: Bishop's Cleeve Church, Gloucestershire, circa 1180

The two pillars in fig. 102 are monuments in Penrith Churchyard. These are the familiar double, 'Runic' uprights, pillars, or spires.

All the minarets and towers in the East display in the peculiar curves of their summits the influence of the same phallic idea, as an attentive examination will prove.

There seems to be little or no reason to doubt that the much-disputed origin of the pointed Gothic arch, or lancet-shaped arch, and the Saracenic or Moorish horseshoe arch, is the union and blending of the two generative figures, namely, the 'discus' or round, and the upright and vertical, or 'phallic', shape, as indicated in the diagrams on pp. 248, 249. These forms, in their infinite variety, are the parents of all architecture.

The Zodiac itself is, in certain senses, a Genesis, or 'History of Creation'. The 'Twelve Signs' may be interpreted as the 'Twelve Acts' of the Divine Drama. Some of the Mosques in the East are surmounted with twelve minarets, and the number twelve occurs frequently in connexion with the theology of the Moslems.

Fig. 92: Almondsbury Church, Gloucestershire, circa 1150 Fig. 93: (Decorated Period) Salisbury Cathedral, Central Spire, 1350 Fig. 94: St. Mary's Church, Cheltenham, circa 1250 Fig. 95: Bayeux Cathedral, Normandy, circa 1220 Fig. 96: St Paul's Cathedral

Fig: 115A is a scale enrichment, introduced into architecture, to symbolize the Female Deity, or 'Virgin born of the Waters'.

The spectator looks to the faces of the figure marked 116.

Fig. 98: Waltham, Essex (one of the Eleanor Crosses) Fig. 99: Ancient Cross, Langherne, Cornwall; Fig. 102: Memorial Stones.

Fig. 117 is a Masonic, Mosaic, or Tesselated Pavement. (Query, whether this pavement of black and white squares is not the origin of the ancient Chess Table, or Chess-Board?) The game of Chess, with the board upon which it is played, is probably 'Masonic' in its invention.

In old representations of the cathedral church of Notre Dame at Paris, the symbols of the masculine divinity--such as the sun and some others--are placed over the right hand, or masculine western tower, flanking the Galilee, or Great Western Porch; thus unmistakably hinting, its meaning. Over the corresponding left hand, or female tower, are placed the crescent horns of the moon, and some other indications, announcing its dedication to the female deified principle.

Fig. 100: Ancient Cross, Margam, South Wales Fig. 101: Ancient Cross, St. Patrick, County of Louth Fig. 102: Group of Minarets or Towers, selected from Examples in Oriental Towns

In all Christian churches--particularly in Protestant churches, where they figure most conspicuously--the two tables of stone of the Mosaic Dispensation are placed over the altar, side by side, as a united stone, the tops of which are rounded.

Fig. 118, on p. 250, represents the separated original 'Lithoi', when united. They then form the 'Double Tables' (or 'Table') of Stone. In the 'Latter'; or 'Christian (+) 'Dispensation', the 'Ten Commandments are over the Altar', composed of the 'Law' (Five Commandments to the Right); and the 'Gospel' (Five Commandments to the Left).

Fig. 104: Column (Campanile of San Marco, at Venice) Fig. 105: Domes at Jerusalem Fig. 106: Top of the 'Phallus', Mosque of Ibu Tooloon, Cairo Fig. 107: Small Mohammedan Mosque Fig. 108: Mosque of Omar Fig. 110: Moorish Tower Fig. 110A: Curves of a Moorish or Saracenic Horseshoe Arch Fig. 111: Cathedral of Cordova: form of the Arches Fig. 113: Patterns of Moorish Doors Fig. 114: Moresque Arch Fig. 115: Alhambra

The ten commandments are inscribed in two groups of five' each, in columnar form. The five to the right (looking from the altar) mean the 'Law'; the five to the left mean the 'Prophets'. The right stone is masculine, the left stone is feminine. They correspond to the two disjoined pillars of stone (or towers) in the front of every cathedral, and of every temple in the heathen times.

Fig. 109: Russian Cathedral, Moscow Russian architecture is strongly infused with the eastern picturesque spirit. The curves of its domes and the forms of its steeples are all oriental. Fig. 111: The Phallus and Discus, as seen in fig. 110A, united Fig. 114A: Query, Aquarius? Fig. 115A, Scale Enrichment

The pomegranate is a badge of the Plantagenets; in its form it resembles the crescent moon; it is a symbol of the female influence in nature. There is here an unexpected concurrence with the crescent moon. and star of the Orientals; for above the pomegranate--which is figured sometimes as the crescent moon in the heraldic insignia of the Plantagenets--the six-pointed star appears in the hollow of the crescent, with its points in the curvilinear or serpentine form. The crescent moon of Egypt and that of Persia is the thin sickle of the new moon reclining on her back, and seemingly with the star issuant from between her horns; which is evidently an Egyptian hint coming from the old hieroglyphic times. This mysterious crescent and star is the badge of the sect of Ali among the Mohammedans, and it plays a most important part in augurial or religious heraldry. The standards of Egypt, Persia, and Arabia are gules, or Mars, or the fiery colour.

It is the ardent, or masculine, or red colour of Ali. The colours of Turkey, on the other hand, are strictly those of Mohammed, and unconsciously honour the female element in displaying the green, or the vert, or the woman's colour, or Friday colour, that of the Mohammedan Sabbath. This green is the vert, or 'Venus', of Mecca (see page 390). The Turkish standard divides party-per-pale the masculine red of the sect of Ali with the green of the Hadgi; allotting to the former the place of honour, or the dexter side of the emblazonment.

The Christian altar is divided, as a hieroglyphic, into two halves or sides, before which the representative priest extends his hands, standing before it with his right hand (meaning the 'Law') to the right, and his left hand (meaning the 'Prophets') to the left; the first of which signifies the masculine (Jewish), and the second the feminine (Christian--because the Saviour was 'born of a woman'), mystic celestial power.

Some monograms or hieroglyphic expressions, meaning the 'Salvator Mundi,' show the Roman letter 'I' (Jesus) in front, in large size; the letter 'H' (which is feminine, and Greek in its origin, meaning here 'Man, as born of Woman') much smaller; and behind, interlacing and combining the first two letters, is the single curved or cursive 'S', which stands for 'S.S.', the Holy Spirit, or the Third Person of the Trinity. The whole, in another way, is 'Jesus Hominum Salvator'. Nearly all the sacred monograms, with the intention of making the letter denoting the 'Man' prominent, present the letter 'I' large; in the heraldic language surtout, or 'over all'. The monogram of the Saviour is sometimes seen in the 'Ark', or 'vesica piscis,' which is a pointed oval figure, familiar in Gothic architecture, and shaped like a boat or a shuttle, counter-changing the letters and the closing arcs, white and black--the black occupying the left or female side according to the ideas of the Templars. The standards of these soldier-monks were white and black, either oblong or forked.

There are two columns of that heavy, severe order, however grand and impressive, which distinguishes the early Norman period of architecture in England, in regard to which, though abounding in far-off hermetic suggestions, we have seen no notice in antiquarian quarters. These two columns comprise a part of the colonnade in the White Tower, or central tower, of the Tower of London. The capital of the first column is square, but it is rounded at the angles by a cut to the hypotrachelium, or base-ring, of the capital. The tops of these cuts are formed by volutes similar to the horns of the Corinthian and Ionic capitals. The male volute is to the right, and is a spiral volve, from which issues a dependent budding flower dropping seed. The volve to the left, which is a series of rings enclosing a point, is female. A twisted perpendicular, like a horn, projects from the base on this left side. The capital of the other column presents a not unusual Norman form of two truncated-tables or faces rounded below and divided in the middle. These we interpret as meaning the 'woman' and the 'man', side by side, and left and right. These glyphs in the two capitals of the columns signify 'Jachin' and 'Boaz', and stand for the 'First Man,' and the 'First Woman'. The mysterious letter 'Tau', which is the same as the Runic Hammer of Thor, and which in truth is a 'Cross,' occupies the centre-point, or, heraldically, the 'honour-point', of the first column to the right. The master-masons were celebrated in their art of concealing myths, or hinting them cautiously in the most difficult and far-off resemblances. The curious reader is referred to our illustration, figs. 119, 120.

The character of the 'Head' which the Templars were charged with having worshipped in their secret 'encampments', or 'mystic lodges', has been the subject of much dispute. Some say it was the head of Proserpine, or of Isis, or of the 'Mother of Nature' presented under certain strange aspects. Others assert that the figure was male, and that of Dis or Charon, according to the classic nomenclature. The object was reputed to be a talisman, and it is called by some the head of Medusa, or the snake-haired visage, dropping blood which turned to snakes, and transforming the beholder to stone. It was this head, or one of a similar description, which was supposed to serve as the talisman or recognitive mark of the secret fraternity or society, headed by Pichegru and others, which was suppressed by Napoleon, and the members of which were tried and condemned as aiming at revolutionary objects. Why Napoleon adopted this mysterious supposed magical head, as he is said to have done, on the suppression and destruction of this revolutionary body--to which we refer elsewhere--and why he chose to place his own head in the centre-place before occupied by this imagined awe-inspiring countenance, and adopted the whole as the star of his newly founded 'Legion of Honour', it is very difficult to say. In the East there is a tradition of this insupportable magic countenance, which the Orientals assign to a 'Veiled Prophet', similar to the mysterious personage in Lalla Rookh.

Secrets of Asia's Pyramid Temples - Richard Cassaro

Click image above to enlarge.

Source

Q the Hieroglyphica by Horapollo

This small drawing is a fragment cut out of an original manuscript written by the Nuremberg humanist (classical scholar), Willibald Pirckheimer (1470-1530) around 1512. The author was also a collector and close friend of Dürer's. The manuscript was a Latin translation from a Greek text, the Hieroglyphica by Horapollo (fourth century AD). Parts of the text can be read on the verso (back) of the drawing. This text was important in the Renaissance as it claimed to explain the hidden meaning of the sacred symbols of ancient Egypt. It stimulated the creation of emblems in which meaning could be hidden except from those who understood them.

This fragment with Dürer's sketches was the first illustration in the manuscript. The sun, the moon and basilisk (half-eagle and half-serpent, hatched from a cock's egg by a serpent). Together these three symbols represented Eternity.

Dürer's illustrations and interest in this strange manuscript is part of his general understanding of the theory and practice of the art and literature of the classical world. This intellectual achievement marks him as one of the leaders of Renaissance studies in the early sixteenth century.

Q Standing on the Shoulders of Giants

Standing on the shoulders of giants

Wikipedia entry captured on 4.14.24

The phrase "standing on the shoulders of giants" is a metaphor which means "using the understanding gained by major thinkers who have gone before in order to make intellectual progress".

It is a metaphor of dwarfs standing on the shoulders of giants (Latin: nani gigantum humeris insidentes) and expresses the meaning of "discovering truth by building on previous discoveries". This concept has been dated to the 12th century and, according to John of Salisbury, is attributed to Bernard of Chartres. But its most familiar and popular expression occurs in a 1675 letter by Isaac Newton: "if I have seen further [than others], it is by standing on the shoulders of giants."

Early references- Middle Ages

An unknown attribution to Bernard of Chartres from John of Salisbury in 1159, John wrote in his Metalogicon: "Bernard of Chartres used to compare us to dwarfs perched on the shoulders of giants. He pointed out that we see more and farther than our predecessors, not because we have keener vision or greater height, but because we are lifted up and borne aloft on their gigantic stature." However, according to Umberto Eco, the most ancient attestation of the phrase dates back to Priscian cited by Guillaume de Conches.

According to medieval historian Richard William Southern, Bernard was comparing contemporary 12th century scholars to the ancient scholars of Greece and Rome. A similar conceit also appears in a contemporary work on church history by Ordericus Vitalis.

[The phrase] sums up the quality of the cathedral schools in the history of learning, and indeed characterizes the age which opened with Gerbert (950–1003) and Fulbert (960–1028) and closed in the first quarter of the 12th century with Peter Abelard. [The phrase] is not a great claim; neither, however, is it an example of abasement before the shrine of antiquity. It is a very shrewd and just remark, and the important and original point was the dwarf could see a little further than the giant. That this was possible was above all due to the cathedral schools with their lack of a well-rooted tradition and their freedom from a clearly defined routine of study.

Religious texts

An illustration of New Testament evangelists on the shoulders of Old Testament prophets, looking up at the Messiah (from the south rose window of Chartres Cathedral)

The visual image (from Bernard of Chartres) appears in the stained glass of the south transept of Chartres Cathedral. The tall windows under the rose window show the four major prophets of the Hebrew Bible (Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, and Daniel) as gigantic figures, and the four New Testament evangelists (Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John) as ordinary-size people sitting on their shoulders. The evangelists, though smaller, "see more" than the huge prophets (since they saw the Messiah about whom the prophets spoke).

The phrase also appears in the works of the Jewish tosaphist Isaiah di Trani (c. 1180 – c. 1250):[9]

Should Joshua the son of Nun endorse a mistaken position, I would reject it out of hand, I do not hesitate to express my opinion, regarding such matters in accordance with the modicum of intelligence allotted to me. I was never arrogant claiming "My Wisdom served me well". Instead I applied to myself the parable of the philosophers. For I heard the following from the philosophers, The wisest of the philosophers was asked: "We admit that our predecessors were wiser than we. At the same time we criticize their comments, often rejecting them and claiming that the truth rests with us. How is this possible?" The wise philosopher responded: "Who sees further a dwarf or a giant? Surely a giant for his eyes are situated at a higher level than those of the dwarf. But if the dwarf is placed on the shoulders of the giant who sees further? ... So too we are dwarfs astride the shoulders of giants. We master their wisdom and move beyond it. Due to their wisdom we grow wise and are able to say all that we say, but not because we are greater than they.

Early modern and modern references - Isaac Newton

The quote is most often attributed to Sir Isaac Newton in a letter to his rival, Robert Hooke Isaac Newton remarked in a letter to his rival Robert Hooke dated 5 February 1675:

What Des-Cartes [sic] did was a good step. You have added much several ways, [and] especially in taking the colours of thin plates into philosophical consideration. If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of Giants.

This has recently been interpreted by a few writers as a sarcastic remark directed at Hooke's appearance. Although Hooke was not of particularly short stature, he was of slight build and had been afflicted from his youth with a severe kyphosis.

Others

Cedalion on Orion's shoulders in a 1658 painting by Nicolas Poussin

Diego de Estella took up the quotation in the 16th century; by the 17th century it had become commonplace. Robert Burton, in the second edition of The Anatomy of Melancholy (1624), quotes Stella thus:

I say with Didacus Stella, a dwarf standing on the shoulders of a giant may see farther than a giant himself.

Later editors of Burton misattributed the quotation to Lucan; in their hands Burton's attribution Didacus Stella, in luc 10, tom. ii "Didacus on the Gospel of Luke, chapter 10; volume 2" became a reference to Lucan's Pharsalia 2.10. No reference or allusion to the quotation is found there.

In 1634, Marin Mersenne quoted the expression in his Questions harmoniques:

... comme l'on dit, il est bien facile, [and] mesme necessaire de voir plus loin que nos devanciers, lors que nous sommes montez sur leur espaules ...

Blaise Pascal, in the "Preface to the Treatise on the Vacuum" expresses the same idea, without talking about shoulders, but rather about the knowledge handed down to us by the ancients as steps that allow us to climb higher and see farther than they could:

C'est de cette façon que l'on peut aujourd'hui prendre d'autres sentiments et de nouvelles opinions sans mépris et sans ingratitude, puisque les premières connaissances qu'ils nous ont données ont servi de degrés aux nôtres, et que dans ces avantages nous leur sommes redevables de l'ascendant que nous avons sur eux; parce que s'étant élevés jusqu'à un certain degré où ils nous ont portés, le moindre effort nous fait monter plus haut, et avec moins de peine et moins de gloire nous nous trouvons au-dessus d'eux. C'est de là que nous pouvons découvrir des choses qu'il leur était impossible d'apercevoir. Notre vue a plus d'étendue; et, quoiqu'ils connussent aussi bien que nous tout ce qu'ils pouvaient remarquer de la nature, ils n'en connaissaient pas tant néanmoins, et nous voyons plus qu'eux.


Added Google translation, not in Wikipedia entry:

It is in this way that we can today take other feelings and new opinions without contempt and without ingratitude, since the first knowledge they gave us served as degrees to ours, and that in these advantages we are indebted to them for the ascendancy we have over them; because having risen to a certain degree to which they have carried us, the slightest effort makes us rise higher, and with less difficulty and less glory we find ourselves above them. This is where we can discover things that were impossible for them to see. Our view has more scope; and, although they knew as well as we do everything they could observe about nature, they nevertheless did not know so much, and we see more than they.


Later in the 17th century, George Herbert, in his Jacula Prudentum (1651), wrote "A dwarf on a giant's shoulders sees farther of the two."

Samuel Taylor Coleridge, in The Friend (1828), wrote:

The dwarf sees farther than the giant, when he has the giant's shoulder to mount on.

Against this notion, Friedrich Nietzsche argues that a dwarf (the academic scholar) brings even the most sublime heights down to his level of understanding. In the section of Thus Spoke Zarathustra (1882) entitled "On the Vision and the Riddle", Zarathustra climbs to great heights with a dwarf on his shoulders to show him his greatest thought. Once there however, the dwarf fails to understand the profundity of the vision and Zarathustra reproaches him for "making things too easy on [him]self." If there is to be anything resembling "progress" in the history of philosophy, Nietzsche in "Philosophy in the Tragic Age of the Greeks" (1873) writes, it can only come from those rare giants among men, "each giant calling to his brother through the desolate intervals of time", an idea he got from Schopenhauer's work in Der handschriftliche Nachlass.

Q Adam as the "Red Man" and the 32 Marks of the Great Man

Friday, January 2, 2015 Adam Was a Red Man by Alice C. Linsley The Biblical writers recognized that the people among the...